UK One News

What North Korean boots on the ground in Russia could mean for Ukraine war

What North Korean boots on the ground in Russia could mean for Ukraine war

Until now, North Koreans in Russia were most commonly thought of as the grinding slave labourers who built soccer stadiums across the vast nation when the country hosted the 2018 World Cup.

But Vladimir Putin’s comments on Thursday at the end of the BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia, appeared to have bestowed a new, elevated status on North Korea and especially its military — that of an important ally — with its soldiers potentially fighting side by side with Russians against Ukraine.

Putin did not explicitly acknowledge that there are now North Korean troops on the ground in Russia preparing to enter the war. But most observers are taking his non-denial in response to a journalist’s question about photographs taken by satellite as confirmation.

“Images are a serious thing. If there are images [of North Korean troops], then they reflect something,” said the Russian president.

He then added that the two nations had just signed and ratified a strategic agreement, and “what we will do and how we will do it is up to us.”

Ambiguous response

For more than a week after Ukrainian intelligence first raised the alarm that up to 12,000 North Korean troops were preparing to join the war, both American and Russia officials danced around the question, preferring ambiguity to openly acknowledging a significant escalation.

WATCH | U.S. defence secretary says there’s evidence of North Koreans fighting for Russia:

‘There is evidence’ of North Korean troops in Russia, U.S. defence secretary says

2 days ago

Duration 0:33

U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said Wednesday that it’s not yet clear what exactly North Korean troops are doing in Russia.

Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. While both sides have relied heavily on weapons and ammunition supplied by allies, and used thousands of foreign mercenaries, this would be the first time that a foreign country has lent its ground troops to the fight.

Precisely what the North Koreans will be doing remains unclear. 

In a statement on Thursday, Ukraine’s main intelligence service indicated up to 3,000 personnel had already been sent to the Kursk area, where Ukraine captured hundreds of kilometres of Russian territory over the summer. 

Other video has surfaced purportedly showing North Korean soldiers receiving Russian military fatigues and gear at a base in the country’s far east.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un inspects the headquarters of the 2nd Corps of the North Korean army on Oct. 17, 2024. (KCNA via Reuters)

“Twelve thousand troops could be only the beginning. This is a number that could increase and multiply many times,” said Alina Frolova, a former Ukrainian deputy minister of defence who’s now an analyst with the Center for Defence Strategies in Kyiv. 

“We don’t know the capability and quality of those forces, and while they may not be extremely effective, they can cause some trouble,” she told CBC News in an interview.

More than two and half years after Russia’s invasion, both sides are facing acute shortages of manpower.

U.S. estimates suggest more than 115,000 Russian soldiers have been killed, with as many as half a million injured. The same U.S. officials reportedly believe Ukrainian casualty figures are roughly half of Russian losses.

Russian tactics in Ukraine have increasingly been likened to a “meat grinder”, relying on enormous infantry assaults, rather than on mobility and technology, to try to take out Ukrainian positions. 

Huge army

North Korea is estimated to have one of the world’s largest militaries, and while it has not fought a war in decades, with 1.3 million soldiers in uniform it would appear to have a vast reservoir of manpower to lend to Russia.

Beyond Ukraine, the larger implications of the pact between Vladimir Putin and North Korea’s unpredictable dictator Kim Jong-un could have far-reaching implications. 

“Kim’s decision to send troops to Russia is not just based on immediate economic and military-technology considerations,” said Rachel Minyoung Lee, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center’s Korea Program in Washington, D.C.

“He cannot have taken the step of sending his own people to Russia as mercenaries unless he had a more strategic goal in mind.”

This image, released by North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency on Oct. 6, 2024, shows live ammunition training with graduates of the 75th class of O Jin U Artillery Academy at an undisclosed location in North Korea. (KCNA via Reuters)

There’s been widespread speculation that Putin has offered to trade Russian technology — possibly even nuclear weapons know-how — in exchange for North Korean help, although there is no proof of that, said Minyoung Lee.

“We do not know what Putin promised, but one thing seems clear: since North Korea is now directly participating in Russia’s war, Kim can probably count on Russia’s military involvement in case of a military conflict on the Korean peninsula,” she told CBC News.

“This will obviously have a direct impact on the security landscape on and around the Korean peninsula.” 

In recent weeks, tensions between North and South Korea have soared once again, with Kim Jong-un’s regime claiming the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal poses a severe threat, thereby demanding the North step up its own arsenal of ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons.

Putin’s calculation

Samuel Greene, a Russia expert at King’s College London, says Putin himself may be unsure where the new pact between the two countries will lead. 

“I don’t think you can argue that he’s doing this because everything is going swimmingly right. He’s facing very real challenges,” Greene said. “He is doing it, I think, relatively tentatively. There is an experimental nature to this, and he and everybody else will learn as they proceed whether or not it works.”

While the reaction to the North Korean deployment within Ukraine has been one of alarm, the absence of a strong response from Ukraine’s partners has been notable, says Frolova.

“There is complete silence,” she said. “You need to react somehow, but there are no easy instruments you can use.”

Both North Korea and Russia are already heavily sanctioned by Western countries and NATO has ruled out sending ground troops to help Ukraine. In a social media post on the North Korean developments, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy underscored his frustration with the country’s key allies.

Russian President Vladimir Putin enters a hall for a meeting with Mauritania’s President Mohamed Ould Ghazouani on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Kazan, Russia, on Oct. 24. (Maxim Shipenkov/Pool via Reuters)

“If North Korea can intervene in a war in Europe, it’s obvious that there hasn’t been enough pressure on this regime,”  wrote Zelenskyy on X. “Aggressors must be stopped. We expect a firm, concrete response from the world. Hopefully, not just in words.”

There has been no indication that Western policies will change because of this latest escalation, with most nations issuing statements of condemnation but doing little else.

“Canada is gravely concerned that North Korean troops were deployed to Russia, which contravenes UN Security Council resolutions,” said a statement from Global Affairs.

American officials said if North Korean troops engage with Ukrainian forces, they would be “fair game.”

South Korea’s response

Perhaps the strongest reaction thus far has come from South Korea, whose officials are now openly musing about providing weapons and armaments to Ukraine. 

“The South Korean government keeps talking about ‘not sitting by idly’ and has hinted at the possibility of providing lethal weapons directly to Ukraine,” said Minyoung Lee. “But it has been saying this since the signing of the new [North Korea]-Russia treaty in June. This tells you that it is not easy for Seoul to take this decisive step, either.”

While South Korean companies do significant commercial business selling weapons, its government has historically been reluctant to supply weapons directly to countries at war.

Minyoung Lee says involving China may be the best approach for Ukraine’s allies.

“I think the best option the United States and the West have at this point is to weaken the North Korea-Russia alliance, perhaps by working through China to exert pressure on Russia.”

Ukrainian service personnel use searchlights as they look for drones in the sky over Kyiv during a Russian drone strike on Oct. 25, 2024. (Gleb Garanich/Reuters)

While the impact of North Korea’s ground forces remains to be seen, there is no doubt that its ongoing shipments of weapons and munitions to Russia have been substantial. Earlier this year, South Korea’s military said the North had shipped more than four million rounds of ammunition, effectively keeping Putin’s war machine going. 

In contrast, Western supplies of items such as artillery shells have been more limited. 

“We have received less than one million rounds from our partners,” said Frolova. 

While North Korea’s totalitarian regime is often mocked for being isolated and backwards in the West, Russians may be prone to see it in a new light, she said.

“For internal audiences, [using North Korean troops] is a plus, not a minus,” said Frolova. “It shows that Russia has partners and allies in this war against the West, and it increases their reputation.”

Published at Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:52:23 +0000

Biden apologizes for past U.S. policy on boarding schools for Indigenous children

U.S. President Joe Biden formally apologized on Friday to Indigenous people in the United States for the government’s role in the abuse and neglect of children sent to federal boarding schools in order to assimilate them into white society.

At least 973 Native American children died in the abusive boarding school system over a 150-year period that ended in 1969, according to an Interior Department investigation that called for a U.S. government apology.

The same investigation said that death toll was likely a conservative estimate.

“The federal government has never, never formally apologized for what happened — until today. I formally apologize as president of the United States of America for what we did,” Biden said at the Gila Crossing Community School in the Gila River Indian Community reservation in Laveen, Ariz., outside Phoenix.

“It’s long, long, long overdue. Quite frankly, there’s no excuse this apology took 50 years to make,” he added. “The federal Indian boarding school policy and the pain that it has caused will always be a mark of shame, a blot, on American history.”

U.S. President Joe Biden apologizes for the boarding school policy in the United States that separated children from their families to try and assimilate them into white society. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/The Associated Press)

At least 18,000 children, some as young as four years of age, were taken from their parents and forced to attend the schools. Biden said the boarding school era was a “horrific chapter” of which Americans should be “ashamed.”

“I say this with all sincerity: This, to me, is one of the most consequential things I’ve ever had an opportunity to do in my whole career as president of the United States,” Biden said at the podium before delivering his apology. “It’s an honour, a genuine honour, to be in this special place on this special day.”

Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, a member of the Pueblo of Laguna in New Mexico, launched the investigation into the boarding school system, and joined Biden during his first diplomatic visit to a tribal nation as president as he delivered the speech.

“It will be one of the high points of my entire life,” Haaland said on Thursday.

U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland speaks ahead of Biden’s apology on Friday. (Elizabeth Frantz/REUTERS)

No president has ever formally apologized for the forced removal of the Indigenous children — an element of genocide as defined by the United Nations — or for the U.S. government’s actions to decimate Native American, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Peoples.

The forced assimilation policy launched by Congress in 1819 as an effort to “civilize” Indigenous people in the U.S. ended in 1978 after the passage of a wide-ranging law, the Indian Child Welfare Act, which was primarily focused on giving tribes a say in who adopted their children.

Attendees listen as Interior Secretary Deb Haaland speaks before Biden at the Gila Crossing Community School on Friday. (Manuel Balce Ceneta/The Associated Press)

In Canada in 2008, then-prime minister Stephen Harper issued an apology to former students of the residential school system across the country. Harper made the apology in the House of Commons, with Indigenous leaders and survivors as witnesses.

The speech has since been translated into seven Indigenous languages.

The U.S. government has offered apologies for other historic injustices, including to Japanese families it imprisoned during the Second World War. When he was president, Ronald Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act in 1988 to compensate tens of thousands of people sent to internment camps during the war.

WATCH | Harper’s full speech apologizing in 2008: 

Prime minister Stephen Harper apologizes for residential schools in 2008

16 years ago
Duration 2:54

Warning: This video contains distressing details.

In Parliament, Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers an apology to residential school survivors and all Indigenous Canadians. Aired on a CBC live TV special on June 11 2008. To see the full event, visit http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1228444227817

About 150,000 First Nations, Inuit and Métis children were forced to attend the government-funded residential schools from the 19th century to 1996, when the last one closed. They lived in substandard conditions and endured sexual, physical, and emotional abuse. The system was “cultural genocide,” said the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in 2015. A 24-hour national Indian Residential School Crisis Line is available at 1-866-925-4419 to support former students and others affected by a residential school experience.

In 1993, then-president Bill Clinton signed a law apologizing to Indigenous people in Hawaii for the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy a century earlier.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives passed resolutions in 2008 and 2009 apologizing for slavery and Jim Crow segregation. But the gestures did not create pathways to reparations for Black Americans.

It’s unclear what action, if any, will follow Friday’s apology. The Interior Department is still working with tribal nations to repatriate the remains of children on federal lands.

Published at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:14:21 +0000

Exit mobile version