Biden repeatedly stumbles, Trump doubles down on falsehoods during U.S. presidential debate
U.S. President Joe Biden delivered an uneven performance at Thursday’s debate, while his Republican rival Donald Trump rattled off a series of attacks that included numerous falsehoods, as the two oldest presidential candidates ever clashed on stage ahead of November’s U.S. election.
The two men traded barbs on abortion, immigration, the war in Ukraine and their handling of the economy as they each sought to shake up what opinion polls show has been a virtually tied race for months.
Biden and Trump were under pressure to display their command of issues and avoid verbal gaffes as they sought a breakout moment. Biden, in particular, has been dogged by questions about his age and sharpness, while Trump’s incendiary rhetoric and sprawling legal woes remain a vulnerability.
Inflation and economy
The first question went to Biden, pressed to defend rising inflation since he took office.
Biden acknowledged that inflation had driven prices substantially higher than at the start of his term but said he deserves credit for putting “things back together again” following the coronavirus pandemic.
Trump asserted that he had overseen “the greatest economy in the history of our country” before the pandemic struck and said he took action to prevent the economic free fall from deepening even further.
Abortion
Biden blamed Donald Trump during the debate for the deluge of state abortion restrictions since the fall of Roe v. Wade. As president, Trump appointed three justices to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped form the majority that overturned the constitutional right to abortion — and he has taken credit for that during his campaign.
Highlighting Trump’s connection to the overturning of Roe v. Wade and its impact on pregnant people across the U.S. has become a cornerstone of Biden’s campaign. Biden has also warned that a second Trump term could lead to nationwide abortion restrictions.
Trump said on the debate stage that he believes in abortion ban exceptions “for rape, incest and the life of the mother,” and repeated his catchall states-rights response when abortion rights came up, touting that he returned the abortion question to individual states after the overturning of Roe v. Wade, which once granted a federal right to abortion.
Immigration
Trump said Biden had failed to secure the southern U.S. border, ushering in scores of criminals.
“I call it Biden migrant crime,” he said.
In response, Biden said, “Once again, he’s exaggerating, he’s lying.”
Studies show immigrants do not commit crimes at a higher rate than native-born Americans.
As expected, Trump also leaned heavily on discussing migrant crime. He also said migrants are coming into the U.S. illegally from “mental institutions” and “insane asylums.” He has not provided evidence for that claim, which he has frequently made at rallies. Trump also said he had the “safest border border in history” — a highly questionably claim and a familiar talking point.
Biden has stuck to his talking points on immigration, highlighting 40 per cent drop in arrests for illegal immigration since issuing an executive order suspending asylum.
War in Ukraine
Trump suggested Russia never would have attacked Ukraine if he had been in office.
“If we had a real president, a president that knew that was respected by Putin, he would have never he would have never invaded Ukraine,” he said.
Trump has a long history of positive comments about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s toughness, including calling Putin’s tactics in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine “genius” and “very savvy.”
Trump expresses no such warmth for Ukraine or Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, most recently calling him a “salesman” this month for the Ukrainian leader’s military aid requests to the United States.
“This place, the whole world, is blowing up under him,” Trump said of Biden.
“I never heard so much malarkey in my whole life,” Biden retorted.
NATO
Biden pushed back at Trump bragging about pushing European allies to put more money into defence.
“This is a guy who wants to pull out of NATO,” Biden said, adding that he “got 50 other nations” to support Ukraine against Russia’s invasion.
Biden forcefully responded to Trump’s NATO comments, saying: “He has no idea what the hell he’s talking about.”
‘You’re the sucker’
The current president and his predecessor hadn’t spoken since their last debate weeks before the 2020 presidential election, but their personal animus quickly came to the surface at the debate.
Biden got personal in evoking his son, Beau, who served in Iraq before dying of brain cancer.
The president criticized Trump for reportedly calling Americans killed in battle “suckers and losers.”
Biden told Trump, “My son was not a loser, was not a sucker. You’re the sucker. You’re the loser.”
Trump said he never said that and slammed Biden for the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
‘Morals of an alley cat’
Almost 45 minutes into the debate, Biden finally referenced Trump’s recent felony conviction in a New York hush money trial.
“You have the morals of an alley cat,” and referencing the allegations in the case that Trump had sex with a porn actress.
“I did not have sex with a porn star,” replied Trump, who chose not to testify at his trial.
Trump retorted that Biden could face criminal charges “when he leaves office,” he said, though there is no evidence of any wrongdoing,
“Joe could be a convicted felon with all the things that he’s done.” He added of the president, “this man is a criminal.”
Environment
More than an hour into the debate, the candidates finally talked about climate change, which Biden has called an existential crisis and a top priority of his presidency.
Trump, after initially declining to answer on climate, said he wants “absolutely immaculate, clean water and I want absolutely clean air.”
He said that during his administration, “we were using all forms of energy, all forms, everything” and claimed he “had the best environmental numbers ever.” It was unclear what he was referring to.
Biden called climate change the greatest threat to humanity, adding that Trump “didn’t do a darn thing about it.”
Biden cited the 2022 passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, which is authorizes billions for clean energy. Biden called it the most significant climate legislation ever passed.
Biden loses train of thought
Biden seemed to lose his train of thought while responding to a question about the national debt.
His voice trailing off several times, Biden first referred to “billionaires” as “trillionaires” before correcting himself.
Then, while arguing that the wealthy should pay more tax, he seemed unable to complete his sentence, pausing for an extended awkward moment, before ending his thought in a way that sounded nonsensical.
Tax reform would create money to help “strengthen our healthcare system, making sure that we’re able to make every single solitary person eligible for what I was able to do with the, with the COVID, excuse me, with dealing with everything we had to do with,” Biden said before pausing.
“We finally beat Medicare,” Biden said, likely referring to COVID-19.
Trump pounced: “He’s right. He did beat Medicare. He beat it to death.”
Two White House officials said Biden had a cold. But his uneven performance could deepen voter concerns that the 81-year-old is too old to serve another four-year term.
Age
More than 80 minutes into the debate, Biden, 81, and Trump, 78, were asked about their age and ability to serve well into their 80s.
Biden, answering with the hoarse voice he’s had all night, launched on a litany of policy achievements and noted that Trump is only “three years younger.”
Biden also used the answer to slap at Trump for bad-mouthing the U.S.
“The idea that we are some kind of failing country? I’ve never heard a president talk like that before,” Biden said.
In his retort, Trump bragged about his golf game and said he’s in as good a shape as he was 25 years ago and perhaps “even a little bit lighter.”
Trump avoids affirming he will accept vote results
Though asked three times, Trump never directly affirmed that he would accept the election results, no matter who wins.
Several times Trump noted that he would accept the results “if it’s a fair and legal and good election,” but wouldn’t give a “yes” or “no” answer to moderator inquiries.
The follow-ups came after Trump ultimately denounced political violence as “totally unacceptable.”
After the moderator asked Trump three times whether he would accept the results of the November election, Biden responded that he doubted Trump would “because you’re such a whiner.”
Biden noted there was no evidence of any widespread fraud in the 2020 election and that multiple courts had dismissed challenges brought by Trump’s campaign.
Published at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:54:14 +0000
U.S. Supreme Court decision rejects Purdue Pharma opioid settlement, leaving victims in limbo
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a nationwide settlement with OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma that would have shielded members of the Sackler family who own the company from civil lawsuits over the toll of opioids but also would have provided billions of dollars to combat the opioid epidemic.
After deliberating more than six months, the justices in a 5-4 vote blocked an agreement hammered out with state and local governments and victims. The Sacklers would have contributed up to $6 billion US and given up ownership of the company but retained billions more. The agreement provided that the company would emerge from bankruptcy as a different entity, with its profits used for treatment and prevention.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, said “nothing in present law authorizes the Sackler discharge.”
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
“Today’s decision is wrong on the law and devastating for more than 100,000 opioid victims and their families,” Kavanaugh wrote.
“Opioid victims and other future victims of mass torts will suffer greatly in the wake of today’s unfortunate and destabilizing decision.”
The U.S. Supreme Court debates Oxycontin maker Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy settlement and whether company owners, the Sackler family — who have not filed for personal bankruptcy, can be held liable for the opioid epidemic.
‘A mockery of the justice system’
The Purdue Pharma settlement would have ranked among the largest reached by drug companies, wholesalers and pharmacies to resolve epidemic-related lawsuits filed by state, local and Native American tribal governments and others.
Those settlements have totalled more than $50 billion. But the Purdue Pharma settlement would have been only the second so far to include direct payments to victims from a $750 million pool. Payouts would have ranged from about $3,500 to $48,000.
Front Burner22:20Will Purdue’s opioid settlement be overturned?
The high court had put the settlement on hold last summer, in response to objections from the Biden administration.
It’s unclear what happens next.
“The Purdue plan was a victim-centred plan that would provide billions of dollars to the states to be used exclusively to abate the opioid crisis and $750 million for victims of the crisis, so that they could begin to rebuild their lives,” Edward Neiger, a lawyer representing more than 60,000 overdose victims, said in a statement. “As a result of the senseless three-year crusade by the government against the plan, thousands of people died of overdose, and today’s decision will lead to more needless overdose deaths.”
A relatively small but vocal group of victims and family members opposed the settlement, including Ed Bisch, whose teen son Eddie died from an overdose after taking OxyContin in Philadelphia in 2001.
“This is a step toward justice. It was outrageous what they were trying to get away with,” said Ed Bisch, a New Jersey resident. “[The Sacklers] have made a mockery of the justice system and then they tried to make a mockery of the bankruptcy system.”
Bisch called on the U.S. Department of Justice to seek criminal charges against Sackler family members.
Sacklers no longer on company board
Arguments in early December lasted nearly two hours in a packed courtroom as the justices seemed, by turns, unwilling to disrupt a carefully negotiated settlement and reluctant to reward the Sacklers.
The issue for the justices was whether the legal shield that bankruptcy provides can be extended to people such as the Sacklers, who have not declared bankruptcy themselves. Lower courts had issued conflicting decisions over that issue, which also has implications for other major product liability lawsuits settled through the bankruptcy system.
The U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, an arm of the Justice Department, argued that the bankruptcy law does not permit protecting the Sackler family from being sued.
During the Trump administration, the government supported the settlement. The Biden administration had argued to the court that negotiations could resume, and perhaps lead to a better deal, if the court were to stop the current agreement.
Proponents of the plan said third-party releases are sometimes necessary to forge an agreement, and federal law imposes no prohibition against them.
OxyContin first hit the market in 1996, and Purdue Pharma’s aggressive marketing of it is often cited as a catalyst of the nationwide opioid epidemic, with doctors persuaded to prescribe painkillers with less regard for addiction dangers.
The drug and the Stamford, Ct.-based company became synonymous with the crisis, even though the majority of pills being prescribed and used were generic drugs.
Opioid-related overdose deaths have continued to climb, hitting 80,000 in recent years. Most of those are from fentanyl and other synthetic drugs.
Canada has also been hit hard by an opioid crisis, leaving to class-action suits across several provinces. B.C. in 2022 announced a $150 million Cdn settlement with Purdue Pharma Canada, on behalf of governments across Canada, to recover health-care costs related to the sale and marketing of opioid-based pain medication.
Purdue told CBC News at the time the settlement did not include an “admission of wrongdoing or liability on the part of Purdue Canada or any of its related parties.”
Sackler family members no longer are on the company’s board, and they have not received payouts from it since before Purdue Pharma entered bankruptcy. In the decade before that, though, they were paid more than $10 billion, about half of which family members said went to pay taxes.
Published at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 15:14:50 +0000
